
Many Dutch foundations and NGOs rely heavily on one or two major funding bodies. When a ministry, municipality or grant-making foundation changes course, this can immediately impact ongoing projects and staff. At the same time, requirements around governance, impact reporting and accountability increase every year. Boards and executive directors are therefore feeling growing tension between their social mission and financial reality.
This article shows how NGOs and foundations can gradually reduce their vulnerability to changing subsidies and build a financial plan that supports their mission for the next five to ten years.
Many organisations generate more than half of their income from one public subsidy or one major funder. That may feel straightforward, but it is risky.
Key points for board and management:
Define a target picture for your revenue mix (for example: no single funder should account for more than 30–40% of total income).
Explore additional sources: individual donations, recurring gifts, corporate partnerships, paid services, project funding from EU programmes.
Run a simple annual risk assessment: which funder could realistically withdraw support in the short term, under what conditions, and what would this mean for your continuity?
Funders are looking more critically at governance: composition of the board, roles and responsibilities, internal control and reporting. Good governance is therefore not just about being “in control”, but also about demonstrating that you understand and manage your risks.
Practical actions:
Ensure that the board and (where applicable) supervisory board receive at least once a year an overview of the top 10 funders, their conditions and the main risks.
Clearly assign ownership of financial strategy within the organisation: who monitors funders’ conditions, deadlines and reporting requirements?
Link strategic decisions (new projects, expansion, new regions) to financial scenarios, rather than only to available subsidies.
Many NGOs still work with a classic annual budget that is outdated after a few months. With volatile subsidies, projects and fundraising, that is too static.
Improvements that have quick impact:
Introduce a rolling forecast: for example, extend your outlook by 12 months every quarter, including expected subsidies, donations and project income.
Define a small set of key KPIs for the board, such as:
share of the largest funder in total income
ratio of structural versus project-based income
liquidity buffer expressed in number of months of fixed costs
Prepare at least one stress scenario per year: what happens if your largest subsidy is cut by 20–30% or withdrawn in year X?
By implementing a rolling forecast and exploring alternative revenue streams (collaborations with health insurers, own contributions, funds), the board can reduce dependency on that single subsidy to, for example, 40% over a period of two to three years, while at the same time strengthening the financial buffer.
For NGOs, financial strategy is not a luxury; it is a precondition for sustaining their mission. By steering more consciously on revenue mix, governance and management information, you increase your legitimacy towards funders and your effectiveness towards the people and causes you serve.
Would you like to discuss the financial future of your foundation or NGO? As a CFO-level advisor I support boards and executive teams with a clear scan of their subsidy dependency, a practical rolling forecast and concrete scenarios, so you know which decisions are needed today to still have impact five years from now.
Plan a meeting
A smart partner for your business
go directly to
© 2025 BPO de administratie
three locations:
Ringwade 33
3439 LM Nieuwegein
+31 30 753 92 40
Van Leeuwenhoekpark 1
2611 DW Delft
+31 15 205 00 02
Schimmelt 2-16,
5611 ZX Eindhoven
+31 40 798 4704